If your having any issues logging in, please email firstname.lastname@example.org with your user name, and we'll get you fixed up!
Started by mrschimpf, Monday Jun 24, 2013, 10:58:56 pm
Quote from: REVM1M;59490So, if i could get programing from NBC on demand, why would I care , about TMJ4 , because all they have is: NEWS, WEATHER,NEWS, WEATHER, NEWS, WEATHER...............
Quote from: mrschimpf;59491Well, today's rhetoric from Journal has gotten very nasty, worse than anything involving last year's Hearst/TWC situation. Now they're saying on the glacial ticker 'Don't be fooled by the exaggerated claims of your cable provider; TWC threatens to take TMJ4 off the air on July 24. For a half-penny more they could wrap up this negotiation and keep the channel on the air for you.' Then a phone number drop to annoy Time Warner; the boilerplate is the same on WGBA.
Quote from: Tom Snyder;59499You can tell the truth by how he answered the first question, and by the 2 questions they chose NOT to allow to be posted and refused to answer:https://twitter.com/MilwaukeeHDTVQ: 1 So if there's no agreement by midnight who really physically takes the TMJ4 signal off the lineup, JBG or TWC?A: At midnight, without an agreement, they have the option to drop the station from their lineup.Following two questions were submitted but not allowed to be posted, nor were they answered:Q: Sure they have the option. But you know they won't take you off if you're still feeding them the signal at midnight. If 4 is not available, won't it be because you stopped feeding it to them?Q: If my math is correct, your "pennies per subscriber" extends out to a demand that TWC pay JBG hundreds of thousands of dollars more per year than what they have been paying. Is that close?
Quote from: PONIES;59501I thought Time Warner received TMJ's signal via antennas just like we do?Or do they have a fiber hookup to them?
Page created in 0.180 seconds with 21 queries.