Now that the weather is gone (for the most part) I find the channel more useless now. Might as well turn it off.
If your having any issues logging in, please email admin@milwaukeehdtv.org with your user name, and we'll get you fixed up!
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: Tivoman44;59984A movie channel wouldn't be the worst thing, whether it's older movies or not. I think it's better than a weather, cooking, or music channel. Maybe a sports channel would be better, to air brewer games.
Quote from: mike31z;59871Brew thanks for you comments.
on 1 sep 2014 all tv must be HD. low or high power.
I only need real low power system in a new transmission market and maybe a 30 ft antenna max to reach my market 3/4 miles. A lot of previous RV user were accustom to seeing the results at different state trap events in their RV (campers) on analog TV.
Now we must be HD.
The sellers of DTV equipment are just not advertising, period.
There is a void in the really low power broadcast equipment on the internet websites and the turnaround for a new license is even less then desireable.
Mike P
Quote from: mike31z;59865score results for the WI Trapshooting Association during the month of july. It may also post admin things related to RV park.
Mike P
Quote from: tvboy;59577QVC home shopping has been added today on 55.5
Quote from: ArgMeMatey;59526No cable customer or cable company is going to disagree with that. But no OTA station owner would agree.
A better argument would be one that no rational person could disagree with. I haven't heard that one yet.
Quote from: SRW1000;59184By the way, we still do have one local that broadcasts 1080i without any subchannels, and that would be the WB on WVTV. :award
Quote from: PONIES;58790Because I'm too lazy to re-adjust my antenna to point towards Milwaukee.
And goodbye to you as well, sir.
If you have a problem with the users of a website called MilwaukeeHDTV expecting their affiliates to broadcast in HD, then you clearly don't belong here in the first place.
Quote from: Jack 1000;58689I hope WISN ratings tank because of this! And they will! The longer they hold out, more and more viewers will dump them and that means less revenue for them!
Greedy corporations like, Hearst, who want a 300% rate increase! Get real and play fair, than negotiations can continue at a price and options that customers can afford. We should not even have to pay for for channels available for free over the air. Television used to be a public trust, not anymore.
Jack
Quote from: PONIES;58557Well, I hope Time Warner gets rid of them. It is absolutely ridiculous that free OTA channels can charge cable companies fees for carriage. I receive WISN via an antenna anyways alongside my TWC. For some reason I get a lot of errors on WISN on TWC.
WISN-TV is nothing more than a useless middle man in between me and ABC anyways. An annoying middleman that likes to add their own bug next to the ABC logo (no other affiliates do this), and stupid weather warnings and temperature bugs from time to time.
If Time Warner is going to pay to carry anything it shouldn't be an affiliate. If only they could negotiate to carry the same ABC feed WISN gets direct from the Galaxy 16 satellite and cut out the middleman...
Page created in 0.165 seconds with 18 queries.