All my data is back, too.
Thanks to WDJT and all those who contacted them to get this fixed!
Scott
Thanks to WDJT and all those who contacted them to get this fixed!
Scott
If your having any issues logging in, please email admin@milwaukeehdtv.org with your user name, and we'll get you fixed up!
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: Jimboy;58047Have the same issue with my 60" Sony. I get the data (or did get it) from CBS58.That's too bad. Dan had spent a lot of time working on this during the switchover. He was really responsive to solving the problem and replying to my messages.
AFAIK Dan Dyer no longer works for them........
Quote from: Jack 1000;58046Hi,OTA with a Sony DHG-HDD500.
Who is your provider? (TWC, U-Verse, Dish Network, Direct TV, or OTA with external equipment?) Give box manufacturer and model number if known.
Jack
Quote from: Tivoman44;57760I am saving up for a TV. I love my Toshiba LCD Regza (37 inch). I want one bigger (between 46 and 50 inches). I need a little refresher course into what to look for.You may not want to discount it, though. Judged on a cost per inch basis, it simply can't be beat. Right this minute on the Vann's website, you can get a 60" set for under $575, including shipping. Mitsubishi is going to be concentrating on higher sized DLP sets, so they're clearancing out the smaller ones.
DLP is a dying technology. . .
Quote from: Xizer;57464If they ever add subchannels though it's going to start looking awful. Let's hope that day never comes... *shudder*There have been recent posts on other forums about ABC affiliates adding the Live Well network. There would be little reason for them to go to 1080i for that reason, though, since 720p does better with multicasting.
Quote from: wxndave;56960I have been a member of this site since 2002. I have always posted information to help the members of this site. If you don't want here how it work then I won't post any more. It's no wonder why broadcast professionals don't want to be involved here.Please don't let the posts of a few members discourage you from posting. These threads are always improved by professionals that take the time to pass on their knowledge, and the vast majority of us appreciate the input and the learning opportunity.
Dave
Quote from: wxndave;56956What broadcasters really need is MPEG 4 1080p as a transmission standard.I would love to see this, but is there an actual chance of this happening within the next decade? If locals started transmitting MPEG4, viewers would have to have a way of decoding the signals. I don't know if there are any consumer-level tuners capable of decoding those signals.
Quote from: ArgMeMatey;56304Being the devil's advocate here, if they do that they will lose some "surfing" traffic from 58-1 and 4-1. In other words channel surfers would have to surf down through 55.1, 2, 3 to reach 49.x. One could reasonably argue that no one would watch 58-4 if it weren't between 4-1 and 58-3!The channel numbers are only virtual, though. While not positive, I don't think there's any reason they couldn't use the actual channel 49 frequency, but assign 58.2, 58.3, and 58.4 as the virtual numbers.
Also Time Warner does not currently provide 49.x on Clear QAM, although they have WBME on midband 19.
Any other reasons (besides inertia) that they wouldn't make a move like this? Have they got grand plans for the 49 subchannels?
Quote from: WPXE ION;56272Do you all sit in front of your TV with a magnifying glass looking for the slightest imperfection?I wish it took a magnifying glass to see these problems. Did you look at the screen capture I posted? How could you not see the flaws in that picture? They're not slight imperfections, they're ugly and obvious.
WOW.
Quote from: WPXE ION;56273Get a smaller TV thenThat's what the promise of HDTV was all about, huh?
Page created in 0.125 seconds with 17 queries.